[#MULE-710] Queues could be implemented via java.util.Queue

Mule

Queues could be implemented via java.util.Queue

Created: 18/Mar/06 04:43 PM Updated: 30/Nov/08 04:36 AM

Component/s:

Core: Queues (SEDA) / Persistence

Affects Version/s:

None

Fix Version/s:

None

Time Tracking:

Not Specified

Issue Links:

Related

This issue relates to:

~~MULE-891~~ Plan roadmap to 2.0 via 1.3.x, 1.4.x

Labels:

Description

« Hide

The current event queue impementation uses a LinkedList and home-grown synchronisation/timeout behaviour. Sinnce we now have 'proper' Queues via (backport)util.concurrent we should probably use those. They are likely to be a good deal faster (especially on 1.5 native) and better tested for obscure timeout/sync problems etc.

All

Comments

Work Log

Change History

Transitions

FishEye

Sort Order:

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Holger Hoffstaette added a comment - 27/Jun/06 01:29 PM

moving to 1.4.

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Holger Hoffstaette added a comment - 14/Jul/06 06:48 AM

Gerhard Aschauer requested:

"
Since I have the need to prioritize requests going into Mule, I would
like to use a 'java.util.concurrent.PriorityBlockingQueue' as I don't
see any other way to satisfy the application's requirements.

So, I would like to make the following request for comment:

"Make the concrete implementation of the interface
'java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue'
used in Mule's various thread pool executors configurable."
"

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Andrew Perepelytsya added a comment - 24/Apr/07 12:42 PM

Descoping the 1.4.1, unset Fix Version for some issues.